• Hello Mastadon, not quite goodbye Twitter

    Twitter has been going through a great upheaval over the last few weeks, with a new owner and now 50% less staff. Hopefully, it can survive this difficult time, but just to put an egg in another basket, I've created an account over at Mastodon.

    Mastodon logo

    My account is https://mastodon.online/@DavidRGardiner, which can also be represented as @[email protected]

    Mastodon is kind of like Twitter, but kind of isn't. The most obvious difference is that it is distributed. In fact, in many ways thinking about it like email (where there are lots of email hosts that all talk to each other) rather than a single centralized, commercial social media company like Twitter, can be helpful. The account names even have an 'email address' look about them.

    I could go into more detail, but there's already a great introduction over at https://github.com/joyeusenoelle/GuideToMastodon/#an-increasingly-less-brief-guide-to-mastodon

    I'm not sure if I'll stay on the mastodon.online server. I've noticed quite a few Australian folks are choosing aus.social, though probably because of that, the server is struggling a bit under load. The nice thing is that it is possible to move your account between servers and I believe it redirects everything to your new location.

    If you're thinking of signing up, you might like to use instances.social to help you choose the best server for you. I only found out about this today, otherwise I might have used it myself! Having said that, I don't see aus.social on it, so I'm not sure how comprehensive it is.

    Verified

    There's no 'blue tick' in Mastodon, but you can verify that a website you've added to your account profile is actually owned by you by adding a rel=me link. I've done this to my blog in a couple of ways:

    1. In the <head> section I've added <link rel="me" href="https://mastodon.online/@DavidRGardiner" />
    2. In the footer, the links to my social profiles now include Mastodon, and links to <a rel="me" href="https://mastodon.online/@DavidRGardiner" title="DavidRGardiner">

    Mastodon recognises the rel=me and shows a tick when you view my profile:

    Profile with a tick

    I was never verified on Twitter (I'm not that important, so wasn't really bothered!), and am unlikely to pay for the privilege, given it sounds like Twitter will be charging for that going forward.

    Finding my Twitter friends

    Finding people on Mastodon is complicated by the fact that if they're not on the same server as you, there's no built-in way to figure out where they are. The best you can do is by looking at the profiles of people you do know, and see who they are following, but that only gets you so far.

    There are a couple of free services that I've utilised that can help with this:

    Moa

    Head over to Twitodon and sign in with your Twitter and Mastodon accounts. Moa keeps a record of other users who have already done this and then lets you download a CSV of any Mastodon users it knows about that are in your list of Twitter following.

    You can go back later to see if any new folks have signed in to Twitodon that you know.

    Fedifinder

    Fedifinder will search all your Twitter following and looks for specific text in their profiles that is likely to be a Mastodon account. To make this work so that others can find me, I added my Mastodon account to my Twitter profile.

    Twitter profile

    Cross-posting

    I really hope Twitter hangs in there. You can keep a foot in each camp with a 'bridge' like Moa. I've set it up so anything I post to Twitter will be also posted to Mastodon. I've chosen not to enable the reverse.

    Moa configuration

    Conclusion

    So as long as Twitter remains useful I'll stick with it, but I'm now also on Mastodon and I'm curious to see how this alternate social media site pans out. Maybe I'll see you there!

  • Adding a disk to a Synology with DSM 7.1

    I recently added another Western Digital hard disk to my Synology DS1621xs+ NAS (as it was warning me that my free disk space was getting low).

    I went with another WD Red Plus WD40EFZX 4GB drive. I was pleasantly surprised that the prices had dropped a bit since my last purchase - from $AU163 (July 2021) down to $AU125 (the price does vary from day to day). I did consider buying an 8GB drive, but the extra price was a bit much. Maybe next time!

    I could be wrong, but installing the drive felt like an easier process this time. Here's what I did:

    1. First off, insert the new disk into a free drive caddy in your Synology.
    2. Now connect to your Synology via your web browser and open Storage Manager. If you select the HDD/SSD tab, you should see your new disk with a status of "Not Initialized".

      New drive highlighted in Storage Manager showing 'Not Initialized'

    3. Select the new drive, then click on Manage available drives to launch the Manage Available Drives dialog.
    4. Click on Add drive for storage expansion

      Manage Available Drives dialog

    5. Select "Storage Pool 1" and click on Next

      Add drive wizard - select storage pool

    6. Select the drive(s) and click Next

      Add drive wizard - select drives

    7. Review any warning about drive compatibility

      Warning about incompatible drives

    8. Optionally choose to expand the volume with these disks. Select Expand the capacity of Volume 1 and click Next

      Add Drive wizard - expand the volume

    9. Review settings and then click Apply

      Add drive wizard - confirm settings

    10. Confirm you are ok to erase the new drive then click OK

      Confirm that a new drive will be erased

    Now you'll need to wait a while. Depending on the pool's RAID configuration, it may be a day or longer before the disk is fully added. You can monitor the progress of drive adding by going to the storage pool.

    Storage manager, showing the progress of a new drive being added

    Once the drive has finished being added you'll see the pool status back to 'Healthy' and the capacity will have increased.

    Volume showing health status and increased storage capacity

    Links to Amazon are affiliate links

  • Azure Pipelines Service Containers and ports

    Azure Pipelines provides support for containers in several ways. You can build, run or publish Docker images with the Docker task. Container Jobs allow you to use containers to run all the tasks of a pipeline job, isolated from the host agent by the container. Finally, Service Containers provide a way to run additional containers alongside the pipeline job.

    You can see some examples of using Service Containers in the documentation, but one thing that confused me was the port mapping options - particularly with, and without Container Jobs. I ended up creating a pipeline with a number of jobs to determine the correct way to address a service container.

    You can see the full pipeline at https://github.com/flcdrg/azure-pipelines-service-containers/blob/main/azure-pipelines.yml

    I created two container resources. The first maps the container port 1443 to port 1443 on the host, whereas the second assigns a random mapped port on the host.

    resources:
      containers:
        - container: mssql
          image: mcr.microsoft.com/mssql/server:2019-latest
          ports:
            - 1433:1433
          env:
            ACCEPT_EULA: Y
            SA_PASSWORD: yourStrong(!)Password
    
        - container: mssql2
          image: mcr.microsoft.com/mssql/server:2019-latest
          ports:
            - 1433
          env:
            ACCEPT_EULA: Y
            SA_PASSWORD: yourStrong(!)Password
    

    These are mapped as service containers in each job by one of the following:

      services:
        mssqlsvc: mssql
    

    which maps the container to port 1443 on the host, or

      services:
        mssqlsvc: mssql2
    

    which maps to a random port on the host.

    I then figured out what was the correct way to connect to the container. In my case (using a SQL Server image) I'm using the sqlcmd command line utility.

    Here are the results of my experiment:

    Regular job, local process

    A regular (non-container) Azure pipelines job, relying on sqlcmd being preinstalled on the host.

    sqlcmd -S localhost
    

    Regular job, inline Docker container

    We're running a separate Docker container in a script task. To allow this container to be able to connect to our service container, we ensure they're both running on the same network.

    network=$(docker network list --filter name=vsts_network -q)
    docker run --rm --network $network mcr.microsoft.com/mssql-tools /opt/mssql-tools/bin/sqlcmd -S mssqlsvc
    

    Regular job, local process, random port

    The host-mapped port has been randomly selected, so we need to use a special variable to obtain the actual port number. The variable name takes the form agent.services.<serviceName>.ports.<port>.

    In our case, the <serviceName> corresponds to the left-hand name under the services: section and the <port> corresponds to the port number back up in the - ports: section of the resource container declaration.

    sqlcmd -S tcp:localhost,$(agent.services.mssqlsvc.ports.1433)
    

    Regular job, inline Docker container, random port

    The random port can be ignored, as we connect directly to the SQL container, not via the host-mapped port.

    network=$(docker network list --filter name=vsts_network -q)
    docker run --rm --network $network mcr.microsoft.com/mssql-tools /opt/mssql-tools/bin/sqlcmd -S mssqlsvc
    

    Container job, local process

    A Container job means we're already running inside a Docker container. (The image used for the container job has sqlcmd installed in /opt/mssql-tools18/bin).

    /opt/mssql-tools18/bin/sqlcmd -S mssqlsvc
    

    Container job, inline Docker container

    So long as the Docker container created in the script task is on the same network, it's similar

    network=$(docker network list --filter name=vsts_network -q)
    docker run --rm --network $network mcr.microsoft.com/mssql-tools /opt/mssql-tools/bin/sqlcmd -S mssqlsvc
    

    Container job, local process, random port

    Because we're in the container job, we ignore the random port

    /opt/mssql-tools18/bin/sqlcmd -S mssqlsvc
    

    Container job, inline Docker container, random port

    And the same for an 'inline' container

    network=$(docker network list --filter name=vsts_network -q)
    docker run --rm --network $network mcr.microsoft.com/mssql-tools /opt/mssql-tools/bin/sqlcmd -S mssqlsvc