I’m part-way through my 3rd week at LobsterPot Solutions and one of the things Rob asked me to do was keep track of my time, so that he can bill clients appropriately. That’s how things work in the consulting business :-)
Some people do this with the old fashioned but very reliable paper and pen. I tried that myself for a bit, but found a) my handwriting isn’t easy for even me to read and b) I wasn’t that good at consistently writing down new tasks etc.
One interesting approach I have seen is to just block out time in your calendar (be it Outlook or Google). That works as a record, but it doesn’t do the ‘adding up’ bit to give you the end of week totals etc.
Surely there must be a reasonable time tracking application that is free and does enough for me to record what I’m doing and give a reasonable I can forward to Rob? One criteria was that it should store data centrally. Being a consultant I could find myself working at a client’s premises in town, at home, or even interstate – so a ‘cloud’ solution is appealing.
The first application I tried was Activity Tracker Plus. It is a Google gadget that you can add to your iGoogle page and cleverly stores data in a Google Docs spreadsheet. I used this for a week and a bit, but found the editing and reporting were a bit limited. Specifically there isn’t a way to edit a previously saved time period, and it just gives you a weekly report but no totals broken down by activity. To top it off when I was trying to correct the time allocated to a task it was messing up the end-time component (a bug I presume).
Lifehacker reviewed Five Best Time-Tracking Applications late last year. Of those, two were web-based – RescueTime and SlimTimer.
Because of that I thought I’d try SlimTimer. This is a simple web-based app that seems to have enough features to make it useable. I’ve only just started using it, so it will be interesting to see if it lives up to expectations. If not then I’ll give RescueTime a go.
Now that my WHS installation is running properly I’m a bit happier because it means I now have a current backup of all of our other computers. That’s a good start, but it doesn’t solve the problem of having an off-site backup.
One option is to buy one (or more) external drives – backup the WHS data to the external drive and then transport that drive to a trusted external location. That’s fine, but it would rely on me being disciplined enough to update it at regular intervals – and I’m not sure that I trust myself to remember to do that frequently enough!
The other option is to use the ‘cloud’ - subscribe to an online backup solution. Googling “WHS Backup” doesn’t list that many useful results. The top result is a relevant question on SuperUser. Scanning the answers reveals two products that apparently DO work with WHS, and a number of products to avoid because they don’t.
KeepVault provide online backup for Windows desktops and Windows Home Server. Their WHS product also includes a ‘client connector’ so you can also backup files from client PC’s too.
Pricing starts at $US48/year for 40GB. A range of larger amounts are also available including 80, 130, 200, 300-900, 1TB-5TB. They also offer a 15% discount if you pay via PayPal.
Humyo don’t specifically mention WHS, but the SuperUser comment indicates it installs and functions correctly.
Their pricing starts at $US8.21/month or $US82.24/year for 100GB. Additional amounts of 100GB can be added for $US11.74/month
So how do the numbers stack up? The comparison is simpler once you get to 200GB and beyond. To simplify things, I’ve used US dollars and excluded KeepVault’s PayPal discount.
GB Provider 40 80 100 130 200 500 1000 Humyo 82.24 223.12 645.76 1350.16 KeepVault 48 89 139 199 480 930
Throwing the numbers into a graph illustrates this nicely. For amounts of data below 200GB, Humyo looks ok, but once you pass that mark KeepVault appears to be the best value.
I can only see our backup requirements increasing, so at this stage I’m planning to sign up with KeepVault.
I think my Hyper-V server is finally behaving itself. In searching for a resolution to the [intermittent BSOD]/2010/02/bsod-clock-interrupt-was-not-received.html), I finally found something that seemed to match my particular combination of hardware and software. I’ve installed the hotfix for Windows Server 2008 R2 that works around this “erratum” in Intel’s Core i7 processors, and so far so good.
The other reason Hyper-V has to be happy is that I also purchased a proper case to house the hardware in. I ended up getting an Antec Three Hundred case from MATS Systems. It’s a nice, smart, functional case. While there are cheaper cases around, Mark from MATS recommended the Antec models in particular because of their cooling ability. The Three Hundred (the model, not the price!) comes with two fans, and has decent capacity for mounting a few hard disks too.
Let’s see what a difference a proper case with extra fans makes:
Component °C (DIY Case) °C (Antec Case) CPU Core #0 41 32 CPU Core #1 36 29 CPU Core #2 43 34 CPU Core #3 38 28 HDD ST314003 #1 53 36 HDD ST314003 #2 55 35
That’s quite a significant drop. Those temperatures seem much more reasonable too.